Going crazy with closing a stack

[Doug Lerner]

On 2/2/04 10:56 AM, "J. Landman Gay" <jacque at hyperactivesw.com> wrote:

> On 2/1/04 5:17 PM, Doug Lerner wrote:
> 
>> I know the local closeStack is not getting handled for other reasons though.
>> For example, "false" is not get put into recordvideo and
>> revCloseVideoGrabber is not getting called.
> 
> Is there another closeStack handler in the hierarchy in front of this
> one? That's usually the only thing that blocks a system message.

I don't see how there could possibly be. This is a substack and inside the
substack's script there is the closeStack handler. And I am clicking on the
close button in the title bar of the stack itself to close it. So it seems
like everything should be local to this stack, shouldn't it?



doug