Going crazy with closing a stack
Doug Lerner
doug at webcrossing.com
Sun Feb 1 23:02:27 EST 2004
On 2/2/04 12:55 PM, "J. Landman Gay" <jacque at hyperactivesw.com> wrote:
> On 2/1/04 8:20 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2004, at 9:05 PM, Doug Lerner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't see how there could possibly be. This is a substack and inside
>>> the
>>> substack's script there is the closeStack handler.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug, that was exactly what I had. A closeStack in a substack that I
>> wanted to work when I closed the substack but instead I "think" the main
>> stack was grabbing the closeStack and not the substack even though the
>> closestack message was 'local' to the substack.
>
> If that's true, then it sounds like a bug. I just made a simple set of
> test stacks, though, and I couldn't reproduce the behavior. There must
> be something else going on.
>
> My main stack has one stack handler:
>
> on closeStack
> answer the target
> end closeStack
>
> Substack has one stack handler:
>
> on closeStack
> put "closing sub"
> end closeStack
>
> I click the closebox in the substack and "closing sub" appears in the
> message box. I never get an answer dialog.
That's what I want to happen here too. :)
doug at agh!
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list