RunRev Pricing
Marian Petrides
mpetrides at earthlink.net
Mon Feb 23 16:45:55 EST 2004
Otay. Makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.
M
On Feb 23, 2004, at 4:43 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 2/23/04 2:11 PM, Marian Petrides wrote:
>
>> Why?
>> Win 95, 98, XP are all one license, right? So why would OS 9 and
>> OS X be separate?
>
> Probably because the Mac builds are two separate engines, which
> require different compiles and separate amounts of time and resources
> to put together. They really are different products and they need to
> be downloaded separately. Combined in the OS 9 engine are versions
> that work with both 68K and PPC versions of Mac OS; so for classic Mac
> you actually get dual duty.
>
> The Windows product is a single unified engine, requiring only one
> build cycle, that works with all Win32 products. If it were possible
> to combine Classic Mac OS and OS X into a single engine, then the Mac
> engine would more closely approximate the Windows engine -- but this
> can't be done.
>
> --
> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list