contains operator

[Richard Gaskin]

hershrev wrote:

>>   if not (x contains y) then beep
> 
> This is the one.

Good catch.  Sorry to have led you astray.  I've been seduced by the 
otherwise orthogonal grace of Transcript.

I wonder why "does not contain" is not implemented?

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Media Corporation
  ___________________________________________________________
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com       http://www.FourthWorld.com