Memory question, old MC versions
Karl Becker
karl at karlbecker.com
Thu Apr 10 12:38:00 EDT 2003
Thanks for the suggestions everyone. Unfortunately, my client tested
out taking out all the stacks whose names get loaded, and that didn't
change memory usage at all.
It is out of the ordinary for MetaCard to take 15,000K of RAM to do
word processing of a 320K text file on a 68K machine, isn't it?
I may simply try backwards-porting some re-written 2.4.3 code to the
2.3.2 environment, as I have no other idea how to fix what I had
created. I guess I could also make a totally bare-bones open/save/quit
program that just loads text, and see if that takes up less memory.
Thanks for any and all suggestions,
Karl
On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 04:18 AM, eric.allen.engle at justice.com
wrote:
> Doesn't destroyStack or destroyWindow clear memory?
> I've never actually used either of these so do be
> carefuly (the names alone are certainly intimidating!).
> But i do get the impression that that is the function
> of those two commands - clearing out memory when you're
> done using a stack.
>
> My Home Page with free online legal information
> Page perso avec liens juridiques
>
> http://www.lexnet.bravepages.com/ind.htm
> _________________________________________________
> FindLaw - Free Case Law, Jobs, Library, Community
> http://www.FindLaw.com
> Get your FREE @JUSTICE.COM email!
> http://mail.Justice.com
> _______________________________________________
> metacard mailing list
> metacard at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
>
More information about the metacard
mailing list